Skip to content
Unverified Commit 67223ee2 authored by aszlig's avatar aszlig
Browse files

nixos/stage-1: Don't kill kernel threads

Unfortunately, pkill doesn't distinguish between kernel and user space
processes, so we need to make sure we don't accidentally kill kernel
threads.

Normally, a kernel thread ignores all signals, but there are a few that
do. A quick grep on the kernel source tree (as of kernel 4.6.0) shows
the following source files which use allow_signal():

  drivers/isdn/mISDN/l1oip_core.c
  drivers/md/md.c
  drivers/misc/mic/cosm/cosm_scif_server.c
  drivers/misc/mic/cosm_client/cosm_scif_client.c
  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c
  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c
  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
  drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c
  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c
  fs/jffs2/background.c
  fs/lockd/clntlock.c
  fs/lockd/svc.c
  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
  fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c

While not all of these are necessarily kthreads and some functionality
may still be unimpeded, it's still quite harmful and can cause
unexpected side-effects, especially because some of these kthreads are
storage-related (which we obviously don't want to kill during bootup).

During discussion at #15226, @dezgeg suggested the following
implementation:

for pid in $(pgrep -v -f '@'); do
    if [ "$(cat /proc/$pid/cmdline)" != "" ]; then
        kill -9 "$pid"
    fi
done

This has a few downsides:

 * User space processes which use an empty string in their command line
   won't be killed.
 * It results in errors during bootup because some shell-related
   processes are already terminated (maybe it's pgrep itself, haven't
   checked).
 * The @ is searched within the full command line, not just at the
   beginning of the string. Of course, we already had this until now, so
   it's not a problem of his implementation.

I posted an alternative implementation which doesn't suffer from the
first point, but even that one wasn't sufficient:

for pid in $(pgrep -v -f '^@'); do
    readlink "/proc/$pid/exe" &> /dev/null || continue
    echo "$pid"
done | xargs kill -9

This one spawns a subshell, which would be included in the processes to
kill and actually kills itself during the process.

So what we have now is even checking whether the shell process itself is
in the list to kill and avoids killing it just to be sure.

Also, we don't spawn a subshell anymore and use /proc/$pid/exe to
distinguish between user space and kernel processes like in the comments
of the following StackOverflow answer:

http://stackoverflow.com/a/12231039



We don't need to take care of terminating processes, because what we
actually want IS to terminate the processes.

The only point where this (and any previous) approach falls short if we
have processes that act like fork bombs, because they might spawn
additional processes between the pgrep and the killing. We can only
address this with process/control groups and this still won't save us
because the root user can escape from that as well.

Signed-off-by: default avataraszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Fixes: #15226
parent ab6e0861
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment