Using review apps in the development of GitLab
Review apps are deployed using the start-review-app-pipeline
job which triggers a child pipeline containing a series of jobs to perform the various tasks needed to deploy a review app.
For any of the following scenarios, the start-review-app-pipeline
job would be automatically started (only when the merge request is approved):
- for merge requests with CI configuration changes
- for merge requests with frontend changes
- for merge requests with changes to
{,ee/,jh/}{app/controllers}/**/*
- for merge requests with changes to
{,ee/,jh/}{app/models}/**/*
- for merge requests with changes to
{,ee/,jh/}lib/{,ee/,jh/}gitlab/**/*
- for merge requests with QA changes
- for scheduled pipelines
- the MR has the
pipeline:run-review-app
label set
E2E test runs on review apps
On every pipeline in the qa
stage (which comes after the review
stage), the review-qa-smoke
and review-qa-blocking
jobs are automatically started.
qa
stage consists of following jobs:
-
review-qa-smoke
: small and fast subset of tests to validate core functionality of GitLab. -
review-qa-blocking
: subset of tests that block the merge request. These tests are considered stable and are not allowed to fail. -
review-qa-non-blocking
: rest of the e2e tests that can be triggered manually.
review-qa-*
jobs ensure that end-to-end tests for the changes in the merge request pass in a live environment. This shifts the identification of e2e failures from an environment
on the path to production to the merge request to prevent breaking features on GitLab.com or costly GitLab.com deployment blockers. If needed, review-qa-*
failures should be
investigated with an SET (software engineer in test) counterpart to help determine the root cause of the error.
After the end-to-end test runs have finished, Allure reports are generated and published by
the e2e-test-report
job. A comment with links to the reports is added to the merge request.
Errors can be found in the gitlab-review-apps
Sentry project and filterable by review app URL or commit SHA.
master
fix
Bypass failed review app deployment to merge a broken Maintainers can elect to use the process for merging during broken master
if a customer-critical merge request is blocked by pipelines failing due to review app deployment failures.
Performance Metrics
On every Review App child pipeline in the qa
stage, the
browser_performance
job is automatically started: this job does basic
browser performance testing using a
Sitespeed.io Container.
Sample Data for review apps
Upon deployment of a review app, project data is created from the sample-gitlab-project
template project. This aims to provide projects with prepopulated resources to facilitate manual and exploratory testing.
The sample projects will be created in the root
user namespace and can be accessed from the personal projects list for that user.
How to
Redeploy review app from a clean slate
To reset review app and redeploy from a clean slate, do the following:
- Run
review-stop
job. - Re-deploy by running or retrying
review-deploy
job.
Doing this will remove all existing data from a previously deployed review app.
Get access to the GCP review apps cluster
You need to open an access request (internal link)
for the gcp-review-apps-dev
GCP group and role.
This grants you the following permissions for:
-
Retrieving pod logs. Granted by Viewer (
roles/viewer
). -
Running a Rails console. Granted by Kubernetes Engine Developer (
roles/container.pods.exec
).
Sign in to my review app
For GitLab Team Members only. If you want to sign in to the review app, review the GitLab handbook information for the shared 1Password account.
- The default username is
root
. - The password can be found in the 1Password login item named
GitLab EE Review App
.
Enable a feature flag for my review app
- Open your review app and sign in as documented above.
- Create a personal access token.
- Enable the feature flag using the Feature flag API.
Find my review app slug
- Open the
review-deploy
job. - Look for
** Deploying review-*
. - For instance for
** Deploying review-1234-abc-defg... **
, your review app slug would bereview-1234-abc-defg
in this case.
Run a Rails console
- Make sure you have access to the cluster and the
container.pods.exec
permission first. -
Filter Workloads by your review app slug. For example,
review-qa-raise-e-12chm0
. - Find and open the
toolbox
Deployment. For example,review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-toolbox
. - Select the Pod in the "Managed pods" section. For example,
review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-toolbox-d5455cc8-2lsvz
. - Select the
KUBECTL
dropdown list, thenExec
->toolbox
. - Replace
-c toolbox -- ls
with-it -- gitlab-rails console
from the default command or- Run
kubectl exec --namespace review-qa-raise-e-12chm0 review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-toolbox-d5455cc8-2lsvz -it -- gitlab-rails console
and- Replace
review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-toolbox-d5455cc8-2lsvz
with your Pod's name.
- Replace
- Run
Dig into a Pod's logs
- Make sure you have access to the cluster and the
container.pods.getLogs
permission first. -
Filter Workloads by your review app slug. For example,
review-qa-raise-e-12chm0
. - Find and open the
migrations
Deployment. For example,review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-migrations.1
. - Select the Pod in the "Managed pods" section. For example,
review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-migrations.1-nqwtx
. - Select
Container logs
.
Alternatively, you could use the Logs Explorer which provides more utility to search logs. An example query for a pod name is as follows:
resource.labels.pod_name:"review-qa-raise-e-12chm0-migrations"
How does it work?
CI/CD architecture diagram
graph TD
A["build-qa-image, compile-production-assets<br/>(canonical default refs only)"];
B1[start-review-app-pipeline];
B[review-build-cng];
C["review-deploy<br><br>Helm deploys the review app using the Cloud<br/>Native images built by the CNG-mirror pipeline.<br><br>Cloud Native images are deployed to the `review-apps`<br>Kubernetes (GKE) cluster, in the GCP `gitlab-review-apps` project."];
D[CNG-mirror];
E[review-qa-smoke, review-qa-blocking, review-qa-non-blocking<br><br>gitlab-qa runs the e2e tests against the review app.];
A --> B1
B1 --> B
B -.->|triggers a CNG-mirror pipeline| D
D -.->|depends on the multi-project pipeline| B
B --> C
C --> E
subgraph "1. gitlab-org/gitlab parent pipeline"
A
B1
end
subgraph "2. gitlab-org/gitlab child pipeline"
B
C
E
end
subgraph "CNG-mirror pipeline"
D>Cloud Native images are built];
end
Detailed explanation
- On every pipeline during the
prepare
stage, thecompile-production-assets
job is automatically started.- Once it's done, the
review-build-cng
job starts since theCNG-mirror
pipeline triggered in the following step depends on it.
- Once it's done, the
- Once
compile-production-assets
is done, thereview-build-cng
job triggers a pipeline in theCNG-mirror
project.- The
review-build-cng
job automatically starts only if your MR includes CI or frontend changes. In other cases, the job is manual. - The
CNG-mirror
pipeline creates the Docker images of each component (for example,gitlab-rails-ee
,gitlab-shell
,gitaly
etc.) based on the commit from the GitLab pipeline and stores them in its registry. - We use the
CNG-mirror
project so that theCNG
, (Cloud Native GitLab), project's registry is not overloaded with a lot of transient Docker images.
- The
- Once
review-build-cng
is done, thereview-deploy
job deploys the review app using the official GitLab Helm chart to thereview-apps
Kubernetes cluster on GCP.- The actual scripts used to deploy the review app can be found at
scripts/review_apps/review-apps.sh
. - These scripts are basically
our official Auto DevOps scripts where the
default CNG images are overridden with the images built and stored in the
CNG-mirror
project's registry. - Since we're using the official GitLab Helm chart, this means you get a dedicated environment for your branch that's very close to what it would look in production.
- Each review app is deployed to its own Kubernetes namespace. The namespace is based on the review app slug that is unique to each branch.
- The actual scripts used to deploy the review app can be found at
- Once the
review-deploy
job succeeds, you should be able to use your review app thanks to the direct link to it from the MR widget. To log into the review app, see "Sign in to my review app?" below.
Additional notes:
- If the
review-deploy
job keeps failing (and a manual retry didn't help), post a message in the#g_qe_engineering_productivity
channel and/or create a~"Engineering Productivity"
~"ep::review apps"
~"type::bug"
issue with a link to your merge request. The deployment failure can reveal an actual problem introduced in your merge request (that is, this isn't necessarily a transient failure)! - If the
review-qa-smoke
job keeps failing (we already retry them once), check the job's logs: you could discover an actual problem introduced in your merge request. You can also download the artifacts to see screenshots of the page at the time the failures occurred. If you don't find the cause of the failure or if it seems unrelated to your change, post a message in the#test-platform
channel and/or create a ~Quality ~"type::bug" issue with a link to your merge request. - The manual
review-stop
can be used to stop a review app manually, and is also started by GitLab once a merge request's branch is deleted after being merged. - The Kubernetes cluster is connected to the
gitlab
projects using the GitLab Kubernetes integration. This basically allows to have a link to the review app directly from the merge request widget.
Auto-stopping of review apps
Review apps are automatically stopped 2 days after the last deployment thanks to the Environment auto-stop feature.
If you need your review app to stay up for a longer time, you can
pin its environment or retry the
review-deploy
job to update the "latest deployed at" time.
The review-cleanup
job that automatically runs in scheduled
pipelines stops stale review apps after 5 days,
deletes their environment after 6 days, and cleans up any dangling Helm releases
and Kubernetes resources after 7 days.
Cluster configuration
The cluster is configured via Terraform in the engineering-productivity-infrastructure
project.
Node pool image type must be Container-Optimized OS (cos)
, not Container-Optimized OS with Containerd (cos_containerd)
,
due to this known issue on the Kubernetes executor for GitLab Runner
Helm
The Helm version used is defined in the
registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-build-images:gitlab-helm3.5-kubectl1.17
image
used by the review-deploy
and review-stop
jobs.
Diagnosing unhealthy review app releases
If review app stability
dips this may be a signal that the review-apps
cluster is unhealthy.
Leading indicators may be health check failures leading to restarts or majority failure for review app deployments.
The review apps Overview dashboard aids in identifying load spikes on the cluster, and if nodes are problematic or the entire cluster is trending towards unhealthy.
See the review apps page of the Engineering Productivity Runbook for troubleshooting review app releases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Isn't it too much to trigger CNG image builds on every test run? This creates thousands of unused Docker images.
We have to start somewhere and improve later. Also, we're using the CNG-mirror project to store these Docker images so that we can just wipe out the registry at some point, and use a new fresh, empty one.
How do we secure this from abuse? Apps are open to the world so we need to find a way to limit it to only us.
This isn't enabled for forks.
Other resources
Helpful command-line tools
- K9s - enables CLI dashboard across pods and enabling filtering by labels
- Stern - enables cross pod log tailing based on label/field selectors