GraphQL Authorization
Authorizations can be applied in these places:
- Types:
- Objects (all classes descending from
::Types::BaseObject
) - Enums (all classes descending from
::Types::BaseEnum
)
- Objects (all classes descending from
- Resolvers:
- Field resolvers (all classes descending from
::Types::BaseResolver
) - Mutations (all classes descending from
::Types::BaseMutation
)
- Field resolvers (all classes descending from
- Fields (all fields declared using the
field
DSL method)
Authorizations cannot be specified for abstract types (interfaces and unions). Abstract types delegate to their member types. Basic built in scalars (such as integers) do not have authorizations.
Our authorization system uses the same DeclarativePolicy
system as throughout the rest of the application.
- For single values (such as
Query.project
), if the currently authenticated user fails the authorization, the field resolves tonull
. - For collections (such as
Project.issues
), the collection is filtered to exclude the objects that the user's authorization checks failed against. This process of filtering (also known as redaction) happens after pagination, so some pages may be smaller than the requested page size, due to redacted objects being removed.
Also see authorizing resources in a mutation.
NOTE: The best practice is to load only what the currently authenticated user is allowed to view with our existing finders first, without relying on authorization to filter the records. This minimizes database queries and unnecessary authorization checks of the loaded records. It also avoids situations, such as short pages, which can expose the presence of confidential resources.
See authorization_spec.rb
for examples of all the authorization schemes discussed here.
Type authorization
Authorize a type by passing an ability to the authorize
method. All
fields with the same type is authorized by checking that the
currently authenticated user has the required ability.
For example, the following authorization ensures that the currently
authenticated user can only see projects that they have the
read_project
ability for (so long as the project is returned in a
field that uses Types::ProjectType
):
module Types
class ProjectType < BaseObject
authorize :read_project
end
end
You can also authorize against multiple abilities, in which case all of the ability checks must pass.
For example, the following authorization ensures that the currently
authenticated user must have read_project
and another_ability
abilities to see a project:
module Types
class ProjectType < BaseObject
authorize [:read_project, :another_ability]
end
end
Resolver authorization
Resolvers can have their own authorizations, which can be applied either to the parent object or to the resolved values.
An example of a resolver that authorizes against the parent is
Resolvers::BoardListsResolver
, which requires that the parent
satisfy :read_list
before it runs.
An example which authorizes against the resolved resource is
Resolvers::Ci::ConfigResolver
, which requires that the resolved value satisfy
:read_pipeline
.
To authorize against the parent, the resolver must opt in (because this
was not the default value initially), by declaring this with authorizes_object!
:
module Resolvers
class MyResolver < BaseResolver
authorizes_object!
authorize :some_permission
end
end
To authorize against the resolved value, the resolver must apply the
authorization at some point, typically by using #authorized_find!(**args)
:
module Resolvers
class MyResolver < BaseResolver
authorize :some_permission
def resolve(**args)
authorized_find!(**args) # calls find_object
end
def find_object(id:)
MyThing.find(id)
end
end
end
Of the two approaches, authorizing the object is more efficient, because it helps avoid unnecessary queries.
Field authorization
Fields can be authorized with the authorize
option.
Fields authorization is checked against the current object, and authorization happens before resolution, which means that fields do not have access to the resolved resource. If you need to apply an authorization check to a field, you probably want to add authorization to the resolver, or ideally to the type.
For example, the following authorization ensures that the
authenticated user must have administrator level access to the project
to view the secretName
field:
module Types
class ProjectType < BaseObject
field :secret_name, ::GraphQL::Types::String, null: true, authorize: :owner_access
end
end
In this example, we use field authorization (such as
Ability.allowed?(current_user, :read_transactions, bank_account)
) to avoid
a more expensive query:
module Types
class BankAccountType < BaseObject
field :transactions, ::Types::TransactionType.connection_type, null: true,
authorize: :read_transactions
end
end
Field authorization is recommended for:
- Scalar fields (strings, booleans, or numbers) that should have different levels of access controls to other fields.
- Object and collection fields where an access check can be applied to the parent to save the field resolution, and avoid individual policy checks on each resolved object.
Field authorization does not replace object level checks, unless the object
precisely matches the access level of the parent project. For example, issues
can be confidential, independent of the access level of the parent. Therefore,
we should not use field authorization for Project.issue
.
You can also authorize fields against multiple abilities. Pass the abilities as an array instead of as a single value:
module Types
class MyType < BaseObject
field :hidden_field, ::GraphQL::Types::Int,
null: true,
authorize: [:owner_access, :another_ability]
end
end
The field authorization on MyType.hiddenField
implies the following tests:
Ability.allowed?(current_user, :owner_access, object_of_my_type) &&
Ability.allowed?(current_user, :another_ability, object_of_my_type)
Type and Field authorizations together
Authorizations are cumulative. In other words, the currently authenticated user may need to pass authorization requirements on both a field and a field's type.
In the following simplified example the currently authenticated user
needs both first_permission
on the user and second_permission
on the
issue to see the author of the issue.
class UserType
authorize :first_permission
end
class IssueType
field :author, UserType, authorize: :second_permission
end
The combination of the object authorization on UserType
and the field authorization on IssueType.author
implies the following tests:
Ability.allowed?(current_user, :second_permission, issue) &&
Ability.allowed?(current_user, :first_permission, issue.author)